Where Is Justice In CT?

Where Is Justice In CT?

By The Screaming Eagle of Freedom

JUSTICE IS MISSING IN MIDDLETOWN CT, THE REAL CRIME PLAUGUING CONNECTCUIT IS THE LACK OF CRIME TO WARRANT THE $5 BLLION DOLLAR ANNUAL PRCE TAG

As I sit here today I find myself wondering what happened to the State Of Connecticut, Its Government, and most of all its State Employees.  Where is/are the representatives elected to care for us, and just what exactly are they really thinking when they go home at night?  I know they all have state paychecks in their pockets and power to do absolutely nothing good.  I wonder this because after observing a Family Court hearing last week Taupier v Taupier and then waking up today and seeing more nonsense this morning and seeing that the local CT news was intentionally avoiding the Baby Aden and Tony Moreno trial, I wondered why civilized society has left the state? 

I am left wondering what had happened.  Where did civilized society go?  The Tony Moreno trail is beginning in Middletown with the illustrious Judge Gold, I wonder what dark thievery and miscarriages of Justice and without a nifty bit of prosecutorial misconduct the state will likely shed all its accountability to the alleged criminal. As for David Gold presiding, I’m sure he will be doing both the job of Judge and Prosecution from the bench, which is why no Media is covering this trial? 

Why are there no cameras slated for this trial of all time?  Let us be clear…the trial is really about the 50-100 state employees who people have jobs, roles and responsibilities to prevent child from being victims of Domestic Violence and from exposure to Domestic Violence and Judicial Abuse, yet the $300 Million dollars spent annually in CT, from the state and federal government highly touted State Programs could not provide a SINGLE OUNCE of support.   I know why this happened, a young Latino child is dispatched as noncitizens for the simple reason that his parents don’t have money or assets to steal.  Case Closed!

The Judicial Branch is the party responsible for and creating the situation of a child being murdered, not just the alleged criminal, THE WHOLE ENTIRE STATE, THE MIDDLETOWN COURT, MIDDLETOWN POLICE, AND TOWN GOVERNMENT.  All of these SYSTEMS are the culpable perpetrators.  assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2286760!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_635/

How is the entire Family Violence System run by the Judicial Branch and Court Support Services Div.  (CSSD)  not in need of a total overhaul after this event is beyond me.  While we are at it, let’s stop all federal grants funding for all these agencies that failed this child.  Stop all paychecks associated with state groups and their failures that resulted in the child losing his life.  Recent article (today) in the http://www.rep-am.com/articles/2016/02/12/news/connecticut/938413.txt

What does all this mean you might ask?  Well let’s recap.  In July of 2015 a well seated Judge (Judge Barry Pinkus) sat on the bench in the Middletown Family Court and denied a family “Protection and Due Process”.  To be clear that was his only JOB, to ensure DUE Process!  HIS ONLY JOB, he was the last line of defense for this baby boy and his mother.  The Court Failed this family, then the police did.

  

As a result, a mother who was abused was not allowed protection by the Family Court in Connecticut.  Adrianne and her child were in clear danger, the violation of the protective order is on the Criminal Docket site as one of the charges.  The child required protection as did the mother.   The entire state and $500,000, 000.00 dollars of resource were nowhere to be found!  This family was failed by 15-20 different CT State services including the Middletown Police and Judge Bozzuto who now herself claims protections against free speech as a victim and gets the protection.  

The requested protection (FPO) in family court is provided by the 100’s of family court services and is large and expansive state tax payer cost burden, yet they were nowhere to be found, except that they were available to Judge Bozzuto and her family for a crime that was never committed.  The CSSD budget is almost a Billion dollars for the CT tax payers to burden, and everyone should be afforded the same amount of service regardless of the income level, Judicial Status or housing situation.  However the reality is… in the Corrupt Family Court System of CT, this is not the case.  The CT Courts are not operated for us the public they are operated for the Judges and Lawyers who exploit the poor, indigent or immature state constituents.  These lower income rarely get attention and even rarer get any REAL support.  These folks of our society are pushed aside, and ignored for higher revenue family court participants or the more affluent divorcing family cases. 

So where were ALL the DCF workers and the 100’s of victim advocate groups funded by the plethora of state funding grants?  The amount of money funneled into these 501-3c is Ginormous.  However, whenever you call one of these state funded grant businesses (**something for help.ORG) there is always a push to go call another service (bigger state announced helper.ORG), and they always say the same thing to every situation, “your need does not really fit our program; maybe you could call X, Y or Z”.    How do I know …well I know, because I have called the numbers and gotten the same messages from the phone operators and recorded these calls on video and Audio.  I did this to see if the calls actually went to different offices or to the same offices with the same telephone worker, more reporting to come on that later. 

So why is this happening when people like Adrianne Oyola of Middletown apply for highly advertised and highly funded support designed by the CT State Court System and 200+ “not for profits” ? …  Hmm that is a good question.  These systems provided by CT Sate Dollars fail their one and only duty; protect the Children and Mothers from abuse?  Remember we are not talking about 2000 refugees in need help, this was one mother in need of a small token of help from a hugely funded state system with 1000’s of programs!

When court support services division (CSSD) publishes their annual budget this past year, the Director Steve Grant traveled to every CSSD office and talk about the potential and pending layoffs for 2015, and I quote, “we are fine for the year and have siphoned away 12-13 million dollars for a rainy day fund, no jobs will be lost or not funded!”

So why is it that baby Aaden Moreno was FAILED by the CT State Systems, the billion dollars of funding, the superior court DV services, the office of CSSD, the Judge Barry Pinkus and every Domestic violence prevention service known to man “not for profit grant based businesses” ?  Answer:  The STATE OF CT does not manage its affairs AT ALL, SEE THE DMV IF YOU DON’T BELIEVE ME!

Why was not one red cent of One Billion Dollars of tax payer funding services available to help protect Adrianne Oyola and her small child, Aden?  Only the state Judicial Branch can investigate and identify that answer.  Why do babies thrown from bridges for the failures of your CT Government, and the only one to blame is the alleged criminal?    

How did all these things fail in the most horrific and miserable selfish way.  How is the mother that had and was clearly in need of support from the well-funded Judicial Branch, only to be forgotten and left to suffer the very things the Judicial Branch is there to manage?  Why do the CT state tax payers have to fund all these “NOT FOR PROFIT” victims services that are 501-3c state or federal grant funded organizations?  Why are all these organizations funded by the state and who are they saving all the grant funding for... someone special?  Or a better question is do all these state run and funded nonprofits just pocket the money and pocket the funding and take home large bonuses and salaries?  

Why is the CT DOJ and Ms. Daily’s office not all over this, well she grew up here and get here direction from the CT Judicial Mafia? 

Who is managing and auditing these Special Funds and State Funded (not for profit) organizations with hidden 13 Million dollar slush funds?  Who is ensuring the funds and money go to the victims and ones (constituents that need it) that need it the most?  Well apparently …..NO ONE IS, managing anything, except watching the water flow under the bridge.

    

Judge Bozzuto is not victim, she and Jennifer Verraneault, founder - Family Court Consultants are victim harvesters, and Linda Allard she has adopted 9 children from DCF and was lobbying for a Judicial “JUDGE” Appointment.  Linda Allard also works for the CSSD division and is funded by the CT Judicial Branch Funding - http://www.ghla.org/staff.   We all know where the power and motivation lies and is centered for the CT kangaroo Courts, its lies with harvesting victims to fill the pockets of Judges, Lawyers and Court Vendors and is subverting justice right under our noses and in plain view.  The word CORRUPTICUIT is real!

Well… we all know the Courts and Judges are not “the end all be all of anything” other than moving cattle to slaughter, violating civil rights and subverting Justice at every turn.  Or in Baby Aaden’s case moving things through to water under the bridge.  The Judges are the last defense in the long line of a 500 Billion Dollar PONZI scheme designed and engineered by the State’s Judicial Branch’s and supported by the DOJ to funnel money, fill courts, and ignore the honor and premise of justice.   

The Judges always whine about how hard they have it, well that is an excuse to allow them to clean their minds for the lack conscious and moral behavior.  Bozzuto often can be heard, well I tried everything to fix this family, except she leaves out the one thing she knows will work, stay out of the family and allow the common sense to be the rule.  

  

How do we know this is all being covered in plain sight… by allowing the Tony Moreno to be charged without charging the 15 – 20 other state employees who also failed their duties and allowed this to happen?  Where is the DOJ with Charging State employees for failing their duties? Well last year the CT DOJ fielded 11,000 phone calls describing the state’s known corruption schemes by State Employees, and not one thing happened, not one thing.  The CT-DOJ is an empty suit.

     

I encourage you all to call the “not for profit groups” and request help, go to court to get help, contact the Vitim’s advocates CSSD services to get help.  Don’t be surprised if you get the run around.  My Question is …Where does all this funding go and who is getting help? 

The answer, plain and simple, NO ONE IS BENEFITING FROM THESE NON PERFORMING STATE SYSTEMS.  Case in Point – the CT DMV is a complete embarrassment, even when compared to a third world country.   NOW Malloy want to outsource 1000’s  of $45K/yr jobs to $7.00/hr part-time employees and keep the DMV payroll the same? 

The story is two threefold, why is it the main stream media has missed this story, and what happened to the $1 Billion Dollars in associated Mandated State process that failed this young mother and child, and why is the Judge not on trial?  Adrianne Oyola applied for a restraining order June 17 against boyfriend Tony Moreno the CT COURT FAILED HER and the Baby!

The Violation of the Restraining order is on the offense state court site, who is the nut job running this circus?    Answer….NO ONE! Why is the CSSD and Judge not responsible for conspiring to commit murder!

Where is JUSTICE in CT?

Starbucks Approved For Washington Street Site

Starbucks with drive through approved for washington street

by brian e. clark

On Thursday, The Planning and Zoning Committee approved a plan for a Starbucks with a Drive Through to be built on the old Computer Tune & Lube Site in the Home Depot Plaza, on Washington Street. I’ll warn you now, I’ve been vehemently against this plan from the beginning, and I still am not, so if you don’t want to read why this an absolutely terrible idea, stop now, have a good day, and a pleasant tomorrow.

The reasons I am against Starbucks, on Washington Street, or anywhere for that matter, Oh, let me count the ways! Starbucks, for one, has a terrible product line, and have questionable business practices, at best. They also, do have some good benefits for the full-time workers there, but the key word is, “full-time”. In any Starbucks location, the number of full- time employees can be counted on one hand. And then there is the Big Box Store Effect, that comes right along with them, and all of the negativity that comes with that. Middletown, specifically, has for decades, been known for our small local coffee houses, and shops.

Now, I write on this aspect of this story because I am personally familiar with the owners of two downtown Coffee Houses, that have been here in Middletown, for over two decades. I’ve come to know the way these businesses operate, and how close to the profit margins they actually are. Here’s a clue: They certainly don’t do it to be rich. They do it because it’s a passion they believe in with their whole heart. I’ve seen countless times where the owners are actually sorrowful for having to raise the price of a cup of coffee 20 cents, because their costs have been raised. These are the people that make up the fabric of our society. They are our community. And they’ve always known, that a Starbucks would be a death sentence. Well, the death warrant has just been signed.

I’m all for bringing business in to Middletown, but never at a cost of some other business, or businesses. People may say, in this case, what about Dunkin Donuts? There is a clear difference between what Dunkin Donuts brings to the table, and what Starbucks brings to the table. Starbucks brand promotes the image of a cozy coffee house setting, and titles their workers, “Barista’s”, and specializing in Espresso, and specialty blends of coffee. Dunkin Donuts brands themselves as a Fast Food Coffee & Donut Shop, and there’s a market for that, they they have cornered, and they do quite well at it. The fact is, The Barista Companies, who own the Franchises of Dunkin Donuts in Middletown, stand to take a loss of business as well with a Starbucks centrally located as it is planned.

In the end, we are selling the Fishing Boat, for a Fish. This one business will infect the business community of Middletown, and slowly kill off all of the small coffee houses that have invested so very much in to the City of Middletown. I myself am a small business owner, and I knew from the inception of my business that I may be able to operate around Middlesex County, but there is no way I can afford to register my business in this City, or State. Being that I operate completely on line, I have the option of registering in a different state, and I fully intend on doing so. Investing in a small business these days, isn’t even a risk anymore, it’s a gamble. With an administration that is so quick to sell out any industry that works for them, that’s a gamble I am not willing to accept.

I’ll finally end with this: Throughout this whole process of Starbucks going before P & Z, I have been very blunt about how I feel about it, and I have disagreed with some, gained supporters, and listened to some people lose their minds. I don’t regret anything I said, because it’s how I feel, and I won’t apologize for that. The truth hurts. That, I’ve come to learn. But this country needs a healthy dose of the truth, because we have been pampered and lied to so much, that everything offends us. So, if you made it this far in the article, and still don’t agree, hey, that’s ok! We don’t have to agree on everything, so long as we don’t lose out f-ing minds in the process.

MICHIGAN COURT PROTECTS ALLEGED ABUSER, STRIPS MOM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS

Michigan Court protects alleged abuser, strips mom of parental rights

CHICAGO, January 27, 2016 — A Michigan mom says Oakland County Family Court has effectively removed her from her son’s life because she presented evidence of abuse.

Lillian Song has been involved in custody matters for more than five years in Oakland County. Her case is in the same county as the controversial Tsimhoni case; the guardian ad litem on her case, Keri Middleditch, is currently the attorney for Omer Tsimhoni, the father in that notorious case.

---

Tsimhoni children cultists, or abused?

---

Song said her divorce started in December 2012 and was completed in October 2013. During that time, she received a personal protection order (PPO) regarding her ex-husband, and that PPO was approved or extended by five different judges.

According to a police report, one incident of domestic violence occurred on June 19, 2013. The report states:

“With the phone in (his) hand, (he) began striking Song across the face. Song advised that (he) continued striking her with (his) hand and the phone for about five to ten minutes constantly making childish taunts.”
The officer taking the report said there was “minor bruising under Song’s left eye.”

The Farmington Hills Police Department, which investigated the case, told CDN that the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office declined to press charges while the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office said no file was submitted for consideration.

Neither entity provided an explanation about why Song’s ex-husband was not arrested. Song initially received an order of protection on June 23, 2013, following this incident.

Song’s ex-husband has been represented for much of the divorce by Emily Long, a criminal attorney. Her website claims, “Criminal defense is all we do, and we do it right.”

Long was an Assistant Prosecutor in the Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office from 2006-2009, according to her profile on Avvo.

Though the divorce was finalized in 2014 and the judge granted shared custody, Middleditch was named GAL in post-divorce because a psychiatrist assigned to case thought a GAL should be appointed due to the abuse. Middleditch was assigned to the case in September 2013 but didn’t start any work until after the divorce was finalized.

Song said her problems began when she noticed bruising on her son after he came home from spending time with his father.

---

The Kafkaesque nightmare of family court

---

Child Protective Services has investigated Song’s ex-husband on two occasions, Song told CDN, based on anonymous complaints he was abusing his son. On at least one occasion, Middleditch inserted herself into the investigation.

Song said that a CPS employee told her that Middleditch told a CPS investigator, “This has nothing to do with dad’s abuse and the mom is unstable.”

Song said her parenting time was suspended after Middleditch informed the court that she had been taking photos of her son’s bruises after he came home from visits with his father.

At a February 20, 2015, hearing, Long told the court,

“I remember specifically asking this because I was so concerned about the content of the photographs was how long have these photographs been going on … And Ms. Song’s testimony was that she was photographing the rectal and anal region of the minor child in question when he was received from the father’s care and then, when he was again, delivered to the father’s care.”

Later in the hearing, Middleditch, who stated that Song didn’t make her aware of any problems and that she hadn’t seen the photos, said,

“I frankly think that if these pictures are as described by both attorneys, have been taken as often as they suggest, certainly even after dinner, which is absurd to me, I find that the actual action is abusive.”

The photos, according to Song’s attorney Vincent Giovanni when questioning Middleditch, were of “severe rashes of the child’s bottom, which she testified occurred at the time he arrived from parenting time with his father.”

Giovanni also stated, during his questioning of Middleditch, that the photos were taken along with seeking proper medical treatment. Giovanni didn’t respond to an email for comment.

Middleditch, like Bill Lansat—the GAL in the Tsimhoni case—is a divorce attorney who is assigned cases to be a GAL. Her training and expertise in matters of domestic abuse are unknown.

---

Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission files complaint against Oakland County Judge Gorcyca

---

The judge, Lisa Langton, refused to allow for the photos to be entered into the court record at that hearing. She said, “I am not going to allow these pictures to be made a part of the record. I don’t want any additional copies made of these pictures. I would prefer that these pictures be only in possession of counsel at this point.”

A phone message left with Judge Langton’s chambers was not returned.

Middleditch recommended that Song’s parenting time be suspended as a result of taking these pictures. The judge agreed, and since that court hearing, Song has only been allowed to see her son in supervised visits, which cost her $35 per hour.

On November 24, 2015, Song sent Middleditch an email in which she alleged seventeen violations of GAL protocol by Middleditch. These alleged violations include:

“3) Reviewing all updated material as provided to the court and parties. – None of the GAL bills list any such activities for the case involving Joshua and his perspective families.

“9) Filing all necessary pleadings and papers. The reports you were to develop and the work product that substantiated your finding and ex-parte discussion were never based on a foundation of facts and clearly violate Judicial process and the GAL standards and

“10) Consistent with the law governing attorney-client privilege, informing the court of the child’s wishes and preferences.” – The child’s best wishes and interest were never documented and were only spoken to the judge on behalf of the child based on ex-parte off record conversations.”

Middleditch formally removed herself from the case on January 7, 2016. Middleditch didn’t respond to an email for comment.

Read more at http://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/michigan-court-protects-alleged-abuser-strips-mom-of-parental-rights-56507/#1kdpz1o5IxiPz2K4.99

Product Recall From The South Fire District

Product Recalls From The South Fire District

1. CPSC, NHTSA and Britax Announce Recall of Infant Car Seats Due to Fall Hazard

http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/2016/CPSC-NHTSA-and-Britax-Announce-Recall-of-Infant-Car-Seats/

2. Britax Recalls Strollers and Replacement Top Seats Due to Choking Hazard

http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/2016/Britax-Recalls-Strollers-and-Replacement-Top-Seats/

**********************************************************************************************************************************************

1. Recall Date: January 21, 2016

Recall Number: 16-081

CPSC, NHTSA and Britax Announce Recall of Infant Car Seats Due to Fall Hazard

http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/2016/CPSC-NHTSA-and-Britax-Announce-Recall-of-Infant-Car-Seats/

Recall Summary

Name of Product: Britax B-Safe 35 and B-Safe 35 Elite infant car seats and travel systems

Hazard: The car seat carry handle can crack and break allowing the seat to fall unexpectedly, posing a risk of injury to the infant.

Remedy: Repair

Consumers should immediately stop carrying the car seat by the handle until the repair is installed. All consumers who have previously registered their product with Britax will automatically receive a free repair kit. To register to receive a repair kit or verify registration, visit www.bsafe35recall.com. Consumers can continue to use the car seat when secured in a vehicle or on a stroller.

Consumer Contact: Britax at 800-683-2045 from 8:30 a.m. and 5:45 p.m. ET Monday through Thursday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:45 p.m. ET on Friday, or by email at Britax.Recall@britax.com. Consumers can also visit the firm’s website at www.us.Britax.com and click on “Safety Notice” at the top right of the page.

Recall Details

Photos available at http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/2016/CPSC-NHTSA-and-Britax-Announce-Recall-of-Infant-Car-Seats/

Units: About 71,000 units (in addition 3,900 units were sold in Canada and 990 units in Mexico)

Description: This recall involves Britax B-Safe 35 and B-Safe 35 Elite infant car seat and travel systems manufactured between October 1, 2014 and July 1, 2015. The product can be used as a rear-facing only car seat and as an infant carrier. The car seat/carriers have a canopy, black shell and base, and were sold in a variety of colors. The Britax logo is printed on both sides of the seat shell and on the carry handle grip. Model numbers and the date of manufacture (DOM) are printed on a label located at the back of the infant car seat/carrier shell.

Models included in the recall are:

Britax Infant Car Seats and Travel Systems	Model Numbers	Dates of Manufacture (YYYY/MM/DD)
B-Safe 35	E9LU65M, E9LU65P, E9LU63F, E9LU66R, E9LS63F, EXLU65M	October 1, 2014 (2014/10/01) through July 1, 2015 (2015/07/01)
B-Safe 35 Elite	E9LS55T, E9LS56P, E9LS55U, E9LS66C, E9LS65U
B-Safe 35 Travel System	S914900, S915400, S915200, S921900, S01635200

Incidents/Injuries: Britax has received 74 reports of handles developing fractures, cracks and/or breaking while in use, including one report of an infant who received a bump on the head when the carrier fell to the ground.

Sold at: Babies R Us, buybuy BABY, Target and other stores nationwide and online at Amazon.com, Diapers.com and other online retailers from November 2014 to January 2016 for between $210 and $250.

Importer/Distributor: Britax Child Safety Inc., of Fort Mill, S.C.

Manufactured in: U.S.

Note: Health Canada's press release is available at: http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2016/56686r-eng.php

Mexico’s press release is available at: http://profeco.gob.mx/verificacion/alertas_nvo.asp

***********************************************************************************************************************************************

2. Recall Date: January 21, 2016

Recall Number: 16-080

Britax Recalls Strollers and Replacement Top Seats Due to Choking Hazard

http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/2016/Britax-Recalls-Strollers-and-Replacement-Top-Seats/

Recall Summary

Name of Product: Britax B-Ready strollers

Hazard: The foam padding on the stroller’s arm bar can come off in fragments if the child bites the arm bar, posing a choking hazard.

Remedy: Repair

Consumers should immediately remove the arm bar from recalled strollers and replacement top seats and contact Britax for a free black, zippered arm bar cover and a warning label to apply to the strollers and replacement top seats. Consumers can continue to use their strollers without the arm bar attached.

Consumer Contact: Britax at 800-683-2045 from 8:30 a.m. to 5:45 p.m. ET Monday through Thursday and from 8:30 a.m. to 4:45 p.m. ET on Friday, by email at Britax.Recall@britax.com or online at www.us.britax.com and click on Safety Notice at the top right, or                   www.B-ReadyRecall.com for more information.

Recall Details

Photos available at http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Recalls/2016/Britax-Recalls-Strollers-and-Replacement-Top-Seats/

Units: About 49,000 in the U.S. (in addition, 11,000 were sold in Canada)

Description: This recall involves Britax B-Ready strollers and B-Ready replacement top seats that were sold separately. The B-Ready strollers have a silver or black frame with a solid-colored top seat in a variety of colors. The Britax logo is on the stroller’s side hinges and foot rest.        B-Ready is printed on the sides of the stroller frame.  The stroller’s model number and date of manufacture are printed on a label on the stroller’s frame between the front wheels or on the inside frame that connects to the back right wheel. The replacement top seats were sold separately in a variety of colors and fit into the stroller’s frame. The replacement top seat’s model number and date of manufacture are printed on a black label on the right side tube above the adjuster button, under the fabric cover.

Model numbers and dates of manufacture included in this recall are as follows:

Britax Strollers and Replacement Top Seats	Model Numbers	Dates of Manufacture (YYYY/MM/DD)
B-Ready Strollers	U281767, U281768, U281771, U281772, U281773, U281774, U281784, U281792, U281793, U281794, U281795, U281796, U281797	April 1, 2010 (2010/04/01) through Dec. 31, 2012 (2012/12/31)
B-Ready replacement top seats	S845600, S845700, S845800, S845900, S855000, S855100, S856600, S870200, S870300, S870600

Incidents/Injuries: Britax has received 117 reports of children biting the arm bar foam padding, including five reports of children choking or gagging on foam fragments.

Sold at: Babies R Us, buybuy Baby, Target and other stores nationwide and online at Amazon.com, Diapers.com and other websites from April 2010 through January 2016 for about $500 for the stroller. The replacement top seats were sold by Britax from April 2010 through January 2016 for about $150.

Importer/Distributor: Britax Child Safety Inc., of Fort Mill, S.C.

Manufactured in: China

Note: Health Canada's press release is available at http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2016/56654r-eng.php

The Ultimate Retraction

The ultimate retraction

by in middletown we trust staff

Earlier last week, we published a letter we received directly from Ms. Marina Golli, in regards to Ted Taupier. This letter was viewed a great deal, but no one posted any comments on it, and we thought it to be a very respectable letter as to the character of Ted Taupier. The letter in its entirety, was actually read to Judge Gold at the Sentencing Hearing of Ted Taupier.

So, needless to say, we were surprised when we received a letter from Ms. Golli this afternoon that reads as follows:

 Dear Staff,

I am asking you to retract the letter that was provided to you by Mr. Taupier on my behalf.

My original letter was completely distorted by him, he changed the tone and content without my permission.

As you probably know, it is easy to do when forwarding someone's email because one can change, add or delete when in a forwarding mode.

I asked him to delete changes but he still went out and published it using your publication.

I am asking you again to retract this publication of my letter

I don't want my name to be associated with Edward's Taupier's in any way.

I am attaching my original letter for your understanding of why I am doing this.

I am not giving you permission to publish my original letter.

I appreciate you understanding.

Sincerely,

Marina Golli

Through other letters we received from Ted Taupier, and Pro Se America, also today, it’s alleged that Connecticut State Law Enforcement went to New York and apparently scared the life out of Marina on Friday morning, resulting in a Search and Seizure Warrant being signed at 1:15pm on Friday; 45 Minutes before Ted Taupier was bonded out of jail by posting a $90,000 Cash Appellate Bond. The Search and Seizure Warrant allegedly confiscated all of Ted’s electronics; Computer’s, Cell Phones’ etc.

This appears to have only slowed Mr. Taupier down for a day or so, as he was back online this afternoon. We can only speculate what happened in New York, with Ms. Golli, and whoever paid her a visit. The one thing that is clear is that it caused her to do a 180, and completely turn on someone she was praising but a few days ago. The rest is for all of your consideration. We will do our very best to keep you all informed as we learn things. Thank you for reading.

*Please also be aware that a Go Fund Me Account has been set up for Ted Taupier. The address is www.gofundme.com/helptedtaupier   

From Behind The Wall, The Saga Told by Ted Taupier

The Saga As Told By Ted Taupier

(Currently Incarcerated at HCC)

This saga all started the Day 22 August 2014, when the Judge in my divorce case and her Clerk accepted the filing of an illegal motion.  The Motions that was illegal was eventually thrown out but not before a hearing was scheduled to hear the illegal ex-parte order of contempt.  Why was the clerk, the Judge and the Lawyer never sanctioned?  This is their game and they make the rules, the attorney was grievanced and the CT Bar threw out the charges of misconduct to which in the this trial she openly admitted to knowingly submitting and illegal order. 

When inherent fundamental rights clash with the immediate Family Court power structure, those common law rights are the first to fall. Under the direction of corrupt institutions the ideal of inalienable rights becomes a misnomer—since the structures in place have the immediate power to deny you those rights, they are no longer inalienable by instant circumstance.

And so it is with the family courts. Although they co-exist in a land where federal constitutional rights abound, and where such rights are legally controlling, these courts routinely ignore them. The federal “inalienable” right to parent one’s child is barely ever mentioned or entertained.

A fundamental rights are not to be infringed upon unless that right was forfeited by the person. Thus, for example, a person found guilty of some offense, via due process, can be denied the right to his freedom.

And yet, federal constitutional parenting rights are violated in family courts all the time along with 2^nd amendment rights.

Through no fault or action of their own, parents are routinely stripped of their parental custody rights, and their right to free speech.  Later after months or years of such constitutional denial, a hearing may be held that in itself can take months in my case 3 yrs to get divorced. 

Why is this a system that is accepted ? 

In common practice, and by judicial design, it rarely happens or it is too late to mean anything; trials last months and usually a “settlement” is extorted from the targeted parent.

Combined with coerced attrition, parents are beaten down psychologically and financially.  The money spent on attorneys and mental health evaluators, and the continuing corrosive denial of their access to their children. During all that time, DCF and Family Services and state employed social workers of CSSD are always looking to justify their existence.  These state employees are constantly yapping at the ankles of parents like they know everything about parenting, ready to pounce upon the slightest anonymous complaint or contrived anonomys call to a tip line.  However they are rarely involved in real scenes of abuse.  These less than trained “know it alls” are eager to interject themselves into the custody proceedings and shift the presumption of parental fitness using hysterical claims, always against the Targeted parent – in my case the father, In Sunny Kelly’s case the Mother.  Gender non specific. 

The most disturbing fact is that for the past 40 yrs all of these issues never existed with the reality of the intact family that was my life. 

In walks Jennifer Verranault who claims to be a “fathers rights advocate”, and instead she has a hidden brain injury and sever brain trama that prevents common rational thought and is an attention whore and likely narcissist.  

Her mere proximity, armed with official henhouse gossip, is enough to dirty the reputation of a well established father of the target parent of CT Divorce Court WAR machine. 

Jenn wants nothing more than her name in lights and media attention.  Irrespective of either the legitimacy of her accusations or eventual findings of my innocence, it is no accident, that a sexual deviant JUDGE  who had her own divorce decision sealed and her entire office are overwhelmingly staffed and driven by ideological Divorce War framework workers that allow the likes of Geri Ficarra and Christopher Morano wide open ex-parte access to Judges and the all out manipulation of the CT Divorce WAR process. 

This War is driven by a key ingredient, a DSM5 classified Narcissist Parent, who is desiring a WAR at all costs.  Tanya is my DSM 5 pschyco and has no therapy and no drugs to control her and is destroying everything including her children supported by the the CT Divorce War system.  When she was in high school she was arrested for attempted murder and assault, she was given work study at ABB. 

I am not a disgruntle parent; I want the divorce and wanted it to happen in 90-120 days … unfortunately I had monetary assets to be siphoned and a full on WARing NARC to fight.  Instead of the Judges and GALs limiting this destruction they encouraged the NARC’s attorney to file 36 contempt motions to my one.  ( mine is now post judgement )

Where was the Gal when the false criminal complaint was being prepared by Chris Morano with the ex-parte call to the Middletown court saying – I have the evidence and seen the evidence and this guy Ted needs to be arrested.  Why is Barbara Hoffman not prosecuting the case, why did the State police investigation comeback with no crime being committed… Why would a prosecutor in judge’s chamber hear the lack of evidence and statute does not fit the arrest affidavit and not drop the false arrest?  Why would Barbra Hoffman call the Chris Morano and ask him for the evidence and he have amnesia to his stamen and Barbra Hoffman not have an affidavit. 

.

All this is considered a perfectly normal template, applied to the assembly line of families and targeted parents to be processed through their machine to justify the 2.5 billion dollar budget

milking parents of their resources, time, money, and quality of life. Most importantly to a corrupt system, it is the money that can be gouged from them, through threats of fines, imprisonment, loss of their children, and public defamation.

With such extortionist powers of corrupt Court, the money pours into the family court and criminal court systems like water from niagra falls

The only ones getting rich are the attorneys, Judges, psychologists, therapists, evaluators, visitations centers, The cost burdening of this WAR is furthered by the filing fees, and transcripts costs.

False or criminal Judicial orders and threats move these things along month after month, with police, tasers, guns, and jail cells not far behind for those who don’t play ball and lay down and die politly.

All these things in CT are very hidden from public view, provide a backdrop cover and concealment of corruption that would otherwise be prime for public criticism and exposure.

But all this thrives in the dark with Judges and police intentionally covering eachother and stipping litigants rights to far and due process. 

The only change that will occure is the festering clusters of insane issues are not being criticized or revealed by local media, then in back rooms the Judiciary discusses ways to hide the insane debauchery of corrupt practices from local media. 

Much as a tyrant like Idi Amin was able to get away with atrocities in Uganda, only while he kept it hidden within his borders, when it spills over into the rest of the world such regimes collapse under their own top-heavy, brittle, and self-justifying existence.

Simply… these Tyrannical regimes are controlled by the US state department, CIA and other foreign power forces.  In 1997 Indonesia went through a significant change, and in hind sight seemed to be an improvement to the geopolitical world stage.  I know firsthand what good regime change look like, I was there. 

Similarly, the allergic reaction that most family court judges respond with, to anything even approaching public attention or criticism, is a consequence of their guilty knowledge of what they do, and their need to cover it up.

Such judges will misuse the power of their office to silence, sanction, remove children from, and imprison those who dare criticize their system.

It makes no difference to them that everything they do is public record by law and a unconstitutional, and is the right of the public to see them. They have no boss and no governance, in 2007 and 2008 the world screamed about the wall street and the TARP – toxic asset recovery program, and the sharp critisms of the hundreds of billions in bailouts,

Divorce court is a 50-100 bilion dollar industry. 

Unfortunatly targeted parents are not always aware of the zero-tolerance attitude of Family court judges when it comes to inalienable consttutional rights. 

savvy attorneys will naturally attempt to game the system by filing frivolous motions in these courts seeking to shut down the opposing side’s public speech, motions that in any other court would be considered legally frivolous, and sanctionable.  The 250 motions in my family case 90% were filed by the ex-wife and her attorney.

Now we find our selfves at a cross roads Information Wants to Be Set Free, internet and common tools allow free and easy sharing. 

As our culture evolves, and since information just wants to be free, we now see increasingly, [1] the popular dissemination and publication of public criticism of governmental institutional abuses, and [2] the reactionary backlash by those same institutions who have grown complacent, sloppy, and self-righteous with the abusive and hidden activities regularly committed out of public oversight and public view especially on Youtube.  .

Funny thing is, the Judicial System power brokers now have to deal with open and anonymous critique and review.  Social medial will be the death of the dark and hidden corruption.  Now the public will see who needs quality control when the corruption is brought to light. 

Like cockroaches, the daily vial and criminal state employees making up these institutions run for cover when exposed to the light of public attention and will therefore try to subvert any attempt to do so to allow the free press and the publishing of negative or criminal information. 

It is the same dynamic that drives police officers across the nation to falsely assert their right to commit atrocities in public, yet demand that no one be permitted to record them doing it.

Similarly, we can see the NSA’s reactions to Edward Snowden’s revelations of their illegal activities, seeking to shut him down preemptively. Even on trivial matters, the NSA sought to shut down even a T-Shirt manufacturer for selling shirts that mocked the NSA.

With the same mentality, the CT Superior Courts have reacted similarly to public disclosure, blocking media coverage of this trial and of their normally hidden inner sanctum of misconduct and Judges prosecuting from the bench.

Recently we learned of one of these CT base atrocities where a 19 yr old man was jailed by a Judge and false prosecution.  Kenneth Ireland was jailed for 23 yrs and his life was completely destroyed by the CT Court system not desiring justice, because the justice system was not intersted in justice they wanted to have fun and destroy innocent man assigned with a Public Pretender.  Later DNA evidence proved his innocentce and we the tax payers get to foot the bill of their preventable mistake. 

With the fortress-like edifice that CT family courts hold against any review or oversight, the only thing they seem to respond to is public attention and outrage and media attention.  The CT Court have implemented policy to prevent uncontrolled free press from covering courts and their ways to keep their violations out of public view.

Illegal edicts, judicial threats, and orders often get conveyed to parents in far more subtle ways, ways that lack a formal written record or order that they can be held accountable for.

Family court judges will order or threaten parents from the bench, not issuing a formal written order that they know can be appealed or republished to the public. In this way they avoid the disinfecting sunlight of public attention, yet still manage to convey their threats and censorship.

Everyone in CT knows there was no threat, the email in question was of ten facts – the facts when collected did not ask or elicit any actions from anyone, and no action occurred.   If the same words were written on a brick train truss in the middle of nowhere the outcome would have been different and no one would have done a thing. 

Free speech is free speech – except in CT where judges don’t look at facts and place themselves on pedestals above the president of the United States.  Use the CT State Police as their private Gestapo’s to violate civil rights. 

In Closing :

Several federal agencies reviewed the facts and issued statements to my attorney this this is not a crime and would never be considered a crime.  How is it a crime in CT when there was the following statement?

CT Judicial all self appointed political absolute power to not follow the constitution but to create distrust of the public

1.    I've seen years of fighting go un-noticed, people are still suffering ... Judges still fucking sheeple over. Time to change the game.

2.    I don't make threats, I present facts and arguments. The argument today is what has all the energy that has expended done to really effect change, the bottom line is - insanity is defined as doing the something over and over and expecting a different outcome ...

3.    We should all be done .. and change the game to get results ... that's what Thomas Jefferson wrote about constantly ....  

In November of 2014, Brenda Hans commented in a public forum in the court house 3rd floor under her commissioner of the court oath : “well he never really threatened the Judge, but he is evil and should be punished because there are small children involved” – documented by third party witness

The email was a list of ten facts nothing more; these facts were to provoke intellectual political conversation like they do all over social media every day.

The truth is my private email was a private conversation, I had no idea there was a connection between a self proclaimed father rights advocate and her mental disorder and the Linda Allard. 

Jennifer never disclosed she took my private email and disseminated it for her own emotional thrill seeking and enjoyment and to start her Family Court Consultants LLC. 

The email was never sent to a Judge and the Letter that was received by Brian Clemens was created and sent by Jennifer and Linda Allard

Lastly – The Judge in this case issued a statement about writing his own jury instructions, this was omitted and when on compares the decision to the current jury instructions we find significant abuse of discretion with the laws and the current jury instructions.