The Saga As Told By Ted Taupier
(Currently Incarcerated at HCC)
This saga all started the Day 22 August 2014, when the Judge in my divorce case and her Clerk accepted the filing of an illegal motion. The Motions that was illegal was eventually thrown out but not before a hearing was scheduled to hear the illegal ex-parte order of contempt. Why was the clerk, the Judge and the Lawyer never sanctioned? This is their game and they make the rules, the attorney was grievanced and the CT Bar threw out the charges of misconduct to which in the this trial she openly admitted to knowingly submitting and illegal order.
When inherent fundamental rights clash with the immediate Family Court power structure, those common law rights are the first to fall. Under the direction of corrupt institutions the ideal of inalienable rights becomes a misnomer—since the structures in place have the immediate power to deny you those rights, they are no longer inalienable by instant circumstance.
And so it is with the family courts. Although they co-exist in a land where federal constitutional rights abound, and where such rights are legally controlling, these courts routinely ignore them. The federal “inalienable” right to parent one’s child is barely ever mentioned or entertained.
A fundamental rights are not to be infringed upon unless that right was forfeited by the person. Thus, for example, a person found guilty of some offense, via due process, can be denied the right to his freedom.
And yet, federal constitutional parenting rights are violated in family courts all the time along with 2nd amendment rights.
Through no fault or action of their own, parents are routinely stripped of their parental custody rights, and their right to free speech. Later after months or years of such constitutional denial, a hearing may be held that in itself can take months in my case 3 yrs to get divorced.
Why is this a system that is accepted ?
In common practice, and by judicial design, it rarely happens or it is too late to mean anything; trials last months and usually a “settlement” is extorted from the targeted parent.
Combined with coerced attrition, parents are beaten down psychologically and financially. The money spent on attorneys and mental health evaluators, and the continuing corrosive denial of their access to their children. During all that time, DCF and Family Services and state employed social workers of CSSD are always looking to justify their existence. These state employees are constantly yapping at the ankles of parents like they know everything about parenting, ready to pounce upon the slightest anonymous complaint or contrived anonomys call to a tip line. However they are rarely involved in real scenes of abuse. These less than trained “know it alls” are eager to interject themselves into the custody proceedings and shift the presumption of parental fitness using hysterical claims, always against the Targeted parent – in my case the father, In Sunny Kelly’s case the Mother. Gender non specific.
The most disturbing fact is that for the past 40 yrs all of these issues never existed with the reality of the intact family that was my life.
In walks Jennifer Verranault who claims to be a “fathers rights advocate”, and instead she has a hidden brain injury and sever brain trama that prevents common rational thought and is an attention whore and likely narcissist.
Her mere proximity, armed with official henhouse gossip, is enough to dirty the reputation of a well established father of the target parent of CT Divorce Court WAR machine.
Jenn wants nothing more than her name in lights and media attention. Irrespective of either the legitimacy of her accusations or eventual findings of my innocence, it is no accident, that a sexual deviant JUDGE who had her own divorce decision sealed and her entire office are overwhelmingly staffed and driven by ideological Divorce War framework workers that allow the likes of Geri Ficarra and Christopher Morano wide open ex-parte access to Judges and the all out manipulation of the CT Divorce WAR process.
This War is driven by a key ingredient, a DSM5 classified Narcissist Parent, who is desiring a WAR at all costs. Tanya is my DSM 5 pschyco and has no therapy and no drugs to control her and is destroying everything including her children supported by the the CT Divorce War system. When she was in high school she was arrested for attempted murder and assault, she was given work study at ABB.
I am not a disgruntle parent; I want the divorce and wanted it to happen in 90-120 days … unfortunately I had monetary assets to be siphoned and a full on WARing NARC to fight. Instead of the Judges and GALs limiting this destruction they encouraged the NARC’s attorney to file 36 contempt motions to my one. ( mine is now post judgement )
Where was the Gal when the false criminal complaint was being prepared by Chris Morano with the ex-parte call to the Middletown court saying – I have the evidence and seen the evidence and this guy Ted needs to be arrested. Why is Barbara Hoffman not prosecuting the case, why did the State police investigation comeback with no crime being committed… Why would a prosecutor in judge’s chamber hear the lack of evidence and statute does not fit the arrest affidavit and not drop the false arrest? Why would Barbra Hoffman call the Chris Morano and ask him for the evidence and he have amnesia to his stamen and Barbra Hoffman not have an affidavit.
All this is considered a perfectly normal template, applied to the assembly line of families and targeted parents to be processed through their machine to justify the 2.5 billion dollar budget
milking parents of their resources, time, money, and quality of life. Most importantly to a corrupt system, it is the money that can be gouged from them, through threats of fines, imprisonment, loss of their children, and public defamation.
With such extortionist powers of corrupt Court, the money pours into the family court and criminal court systems like water from niagra falls
The only ones getting rich are the attorneys, Judges, psychologists, therapists, evaluators, visitations centers, The cost burdening of this WAR is furthered by the filing fees, and transcripts costs.
False or criminal Judicial orders and threats move these things along month after month, with police, tasers, guns, and jail cells not far behind for those who don’t play ball and lay down and die politly.
All these things in CT are very hidden from public view, provide a backdrop cover and concealment of corruption that would otherwise be prime for public criticism and exposure.
But all this thrives in the dark with Judges and police intentionally covering eachother and stipping litigants rights to far and due process.
The only change that will occure is the festering clusters of insane issues are not being criticized or revealed by local media, then in back rooms the Judiciary discusses ways to hide the insane debauchery of corrupt practices from local media.
Much as a tyrant like Idi Amin was able to get away with atrocities in Uganda, only while he kept it hidden within his borders, when it spills over into the rest of the world such regimes collapse under their own top-heavy, brittle, and self-justifying existence.
Simply… these Tyrannical regimes are controlled by the US state department, CIA and other foreign power forces. In 1997 Indonesia went through a significant change, and in hind sight seemed to be an improvement to the geopolitical world stage. I know firsthand what good regime change look like, I was there.
Similarly, the allergic reaction that most family court judges respond with, to anything even approaching public attention or criticism, is a consequence of their guilty knowledge of what they do, and their need to cover it up.
Such judges will misuse the power of their office to silence, sanction, remove children from, and imprison those who dare criticize their system.
It makes no difference to them that everything they do is public record by law and a unconstitutional, and is the right of the public to see them. They have no boss and no governance, in 2007 and 2008 the world screamed about the wall street and the TARP – toxic asset recovery program, and the sharp critisms of the hundreds of billions in bailouts,
Divorce court is a 50-100 bilion dollar industry.
Unfortunatly targeted parents are not always aware of the zero-tolerance attitude of Family court judges when it comes to inalienable consttutional rights.
savvy attorneys will naturally attempt to game the system by filing frivolous motions in these courts seeking to shut down the opposing side’s public speech, motions that in any other court would be considered legally frivolous, and sanctionable. The 250 motions in my family case 90% were filed by the ex-wife and her attorney.
Now we find our selfves at a cross roads Information Wants to Be Set Free, internet and common tools allow free and easy sharing.
As our culture evolves, and since information just wants to be free, we now see increasingly,  the popular dissemination and publication of public criticism of governmental institutional abuses, and  the reactionary backlash by those same institutions who have grown complacent, sloppy, and self-righteous with the abusive and hidden activities regularly committed out of public oversight and public view especially on Youtube. .
Funny thing is, the Judicial System power brokers now have to deal with open and anonymous critique and review. Social medial will be the death of the dark and hidden corruption. Now the public will see who needs quality control when the corruption is brought to light.
Like cockroaches, the daily vial and criminal state employees making up these institutions run for cover when exposed to the light of public attention and will therefore try to subvert any attempt to do so to allow the free press and the publishing of negative or criminal information.
It is the same dynamic that drives police officers across the nation to falsely assert their right to commit atrocities in public, yet demand that no one be permitted to record them doing it.
Similarly, we can see the NSA’s reactions to Edward Snowden’s revelations of their illegal activities, seeking to shut him down preemptively. Even on trivial matters, the NSA sought to shut down even a T-Shirt manufacturer for selling shirts that mocked the NSA.
With the same mentality, the CT Superior Courts have reacted similarly to public disclosure, blocking media coverage of this trial and of their normally hidden inner sanctum of misconduct and Judges prosecuting from the bench.
Recently we learned of one of these CT base atrocities where a 19 yr old man was jailed by a Judge and false prosecution. Kenneth Ireland was jailed for 23 yrs and his life was completely destroyed by the CT Court system not desiring justice, because the justice system was not intersted in justice they wanted to have fun and destroy innocent man assigned with a Public Pretender. Later DNA evidence proved his innocentce and we the tax payers get to foot the bill of their preventable mistake.
With the fortress-like edifice that CT family courts hold against any review or oversight, the only thing they seem to respond to is public attention and outrage and media attention. The CT Court have implemented policy to prevent uncontrolled free press from covering courts and their ways to keep their violations out of public view.
Illegal edicts, judicial threats, and orders often get conveyed to parents in far more subtle ways, ways that lack a formal written record or order that they can be held accountable for.
Family court judges will order or threaten parents from the bench, not issuing a formal written order that they know can be appealed or republished to the public. In this way they avoid the disinfecting sunlight of public attention, yet still manage to convey their threats and censorship.
Everyone in CT knows there was no threat, the email in question was of ten facts – the facts when collected did not ask or elicit any actions from anyone, and no action occurred. If the same words were written on a brick train truss in the middle of nowhere the outcome would have been different and no one would have done a thing.
Free speech is free speech – except in CT where judges don’t look at facts and place themselves on pedestals above the president of the United States. Use the CT State Police as their private Gestapo’s to violate civil rights.
In Closing :
Several federal agencies reviewed the facts and issued statements to my attorney this this is not a crime and would never be considered a crime. How is it a crime in CT when there was the following statement?
CT Judicial all self appointed political absolute power to not follow the constitution but to create distrust of the public
1. I've seen years of fighting go un-noticed, people are still suffering ... Judges still fucking sheeple over. Time to change the game.
2. I don't make threats, I present facts and arguments. The argument today is what has all the energy that has expended done to really effect change, the bottom line is - insanity is defined as doing the something over and over and expecting a different outcome ...
3. We should all be done .. and change the game to get results ... that's what Thomas Jefferson wrote about constantly ....
In November of 2014, Brenda Hans commented in a public forum in the court house 3rd floor under her commissioner of the court oath : “well he never really threatened the Judge, but he is evil and should be punished because there are small children involved” – documented by third party witness
The email was a list of ten facts nothing more; these facts were to provoke intellectual political conversation like they do all over social media every day.
The truth is my private email was a private conversation, I had no idea there was a connection between a self proclaimed father rights advocate and her mental disorder and the Linda Allard.
Jennifer never disclosed she took my private email and disseminated it for her own emotional thrill seeking and enjoyment and to start her Family Court Consultants LLC.
The email was never sent to a Judge and the Letter that was received by Brian Clemens was created and sent by Jennifer and Linda Allard
Lastly – The Judge in this case issued a statement about writing his own jury instructions, this was omitted and when on compares the decision to the current jury instructions we find significant abuse of discretion with the laws and the current jury instructions.